The binomial distribution counts successes in a fixed number of independent trials . Recognising when it applies — and when it does not — matters more than the arithmetic.
When a binomial applies
Four conditions, all required:
A fixed number of trials, n n n , decided in advance.
Each trial has exactly two outcomes — success or failure.
The probability of success, p p p , is constant across trials.
The trials are independent .
Then X X X , the number of successes, follows
X ∼ B ( n , p ) X \sim B(n, p) X ∼ B ( n , p )
Qualifies: 20 free throws at a fixed success rate; 15 components tested from a large production run; 10 tosses of a coin.
Does not qualify: drawing 5 cards from a deck without replacement — p p p changes each draw; counting how many attempts until the first success — n n n is not fixed; recording exam grades A–F — more than two outcomes.
Key result Sampling without replacement violates conditions 3 and 4 together. It is acceptable as an approximation only when the sample is small relative to the population — under about 10% — so that p p p barely moves.
P ( X = r ) = ( n r ) p r q n − r where q = 1 − p P(X = r) = \binom{n}{r}p^r q^{n-r} \qquad \text{where } q = 1-p P ( X = r ) = ( r n ) p r q n − r where q = 1 − p
The three parts: ( n r ) \binom{n}{r} ( r n ) counts the orders in which r r r successes can occur, p r p^r p r is the probability of those successes, and q n − r q^{n-r} q n − r the probability of the remaining failures.
For X ∼ B ( 10 , 0.3 ) X \sim B(10, 0.3) X ∼ B ( 10 , 0.3 ) , find P ( X = 3 ) P(X = 3) P ( X = 3 ) .
P ( X = 3 ) = ( 10 3 ) ( 0.3 ) 3 ( 0.7 ) 7 = 120 × 0.027 × 0.0823543 = 0.267 (3 s.f.) P(X=3) = \binom{10}{3}(0.3)^3(0.7)^7 = 120 \times 0.027 \times 0.0823543 = 0.267 \text{ (3 s.f.)} P ( X = 3 ) = ( 3 10 ) ( 0.3 ) 3 ( 0.7 ) 7 = 120 × 0.027 × 0.0823543 = 0.267 (3 s.f.)
For X ∼ B ( 5 , 0.5 ) X \sim B(5, 0.5) X ∼ B ( 5 , 0.5 ) , find P ( X = 2 ) P(X = 2) P ( X = 2 ) .
( 5 2 ) ( 0.5 ) 2 ( 0.5 ) 3 = 10 × ( 0.5 ) 5 = 10 32 = 0.3125 \binom52 (0.5)^2(0.5)^3 = 10 \times (0.5)^5 = \frac{10}{32} = 0.3125 ( 2 5 ) ( 0.5 ) 2 ( 0.5 ) 3 = 10 × ( 0.5 ) 5 = 32 10 = 0.3125
Common mistake The exponents must add to n n n : r r r successes and n − r n - r n − r failures. If your two powers do not total n n n , the term is wrong.
Cumulative probabilities
"At most", "at least" and "fewer than" require several terms added — or, far more often, a complement.
For X ∼ B ( 10 , 0.3 ) X \sim B(10, 0.3) X ∼ B ( 10 , 0.3 ) , find P ( X ≤ 1 ) P(X \le 1) P ( X ≤ 1 ) .
P ( X = 0 ) = ( 0.7 ) 10 = 0.0282 P(X=0) = (0.7)^{10} = 0.0282 P ( X = 0 ) = ( 0.7 ) 10 = 0.0282
P ( X = 1 ) = ( 10 1 ) ( 0.3 ) ( 0.7 ) 9 = 10 × 0.3 × 0.040354 = 0.1211 P(X=1) = \binom{10}{1}(0.3)(0.7)^9 = 10 \times 0.3 \times 0.040354 = 0.1211 P ( X = 1 ) = ( 1 10 ) ( 0.3 ) ( 0.7 ) 9 = 10 × 0.3 × 0.040354 = 0.1211
P ( X ≤ 1 ) = 0.0282 + 0.1211 = 0.149 (3 s.f.) P(X \le 1) = 0.0282 + 0.1211 = 0.149 \text{ (3 s.f.)} P ( X ≤ 1 ) = 0.0282 + 0.1211 = 0.149 (3 s.f.)
And P ( X ≥ 1 ) P(X \ge 1) P ( X ≥ 1 ) ?
P ( X ≥ 1 ) = 1 − P ( X = 0 ) = 1 − 0.0282 = 0.972 P(X \ge 1) = 1 - P(X = 0) = 1 - 0.0282 = 0.972 P ( X ≥ 1 ) = 1 − P ( X = 0 ) = 1 − 0.0282 = 0.972
— one term instead of ten.
Key result "At least one" is always 1 − P ( none ) 1 - P(\text{none}) 1 − P ( none ) . Recognising this converts the longest calculation in the topic into the shortest.
Common mistake For a discrete variable P ( X < 3 ) P(X < 3) P ( X < 3 ) and P ( X ≤ 3 ) P(X \le 3) P ( X ≤ 3 ) differ: the first stops at X = 2 X = 2 X = 2 . Translate the words carefully — "more than 3" is X ≥ 4 X \ge 4 X ≥ 4 , while "at least 3" is X ≥ 3 X \ge 3 X ≥ 3 .
Mean and variance
E ( X ) = n p Var ( X ) = n p q E(X) = np \qquad \operatorname{Var}(X) = npq E ( X ) = n p Var ( X ) = n pq
For X ∼ B ( 10 , 0.3 ) X \sim B(10, 0.3) X ∼ B ( 10 , 0.3 ) :
E ( X ) = 10 × 0.3 = 3 Var ( X ) = 10 × 0.3 × 0.7 = 2.1 E(X) = 10 \times 0.3 = 3 \qquad \operatorname{Var}(X) = 10 \times 0.3 \times 0.7 = 2.1 E ( X ) = 10 × 0.3 = 3 Var ( X ) = 10 × 0.3 × 0.7 = 2.1
The standard deviation is 2.1 = 1.45 \sqrt{2.1} = 1.45 2.1 = 1.45 .
The mean is intuitive: 10 trials at a 30% success rate should give about 3 successes.
Key result The variance is n p q npq n pq , not n p np n p . It is largest when p = 0.5 p = 0.5 p = 0.5 — that is when the outcome is least predictable — and shrinks towards 0 as p p p approaches 0 or 1, where the result is nearly certain.
The shape of the distribution
p = 0.5 p = 0.5 p = 0.5 — symmetric about n 2 \frac{n}{2} 2 n .
p < 0.5 p < 0.5 p < 0.5 — positively skewed , bunched towards the low values.
p > 0.5 p > 0.5 p > 0.5 — negatively skewed , bunched towards the high values.
As n n n grows the distribution becomes more symmetric whatever p p p is, which is why a binomial with large n n n can be approximated by a normal distribution.
Modelling with the binomial
Setting up a binomial problem means answering three questions:
What is a trial? One free throw, one component tested, one person surveyed.
What counts as a success? Define it explicitly — and note it need not be a good thing. "Defective" is a perfectly valid success.
Are the four conditions met? State them if the question asks you to justify the model.
A basketball player scores 70% of free throws and takes 12. Find the probability of scoring exactly 9.
A trial is one throw; success is scoring; p = 0.7 p = 0.7 p = 0.7 is constant if the throws are independent and the player's form does not change.
X ∼ B ( 12 , 0.7 ) P ( X = 9 ) = ( 12 9 ) ( 0.7 ) 9 ( 0.3 ) 3 = 0.240 (3 s.f.) X \sim B(12, 0.7) \qquad P(X = 9) = \binom{12}{9}(0.7)^9(0.3)^3 = 0.240 \text{ (3 s.f.)} X ∼ B ( 12 , 0.7 ) P ( X = 9 ) = ( 9 12 ) ( 0.7 ) 9 ( 0.3 ) 3 = 0.240 (3 s.f.)
Common mistake Independence is the condition most often violated in practice. If a player's confidence rises after each success, the trials are not independent and the binomial model — while still a reasonable approximation — is not exactly right. Exam questions frequently ask for exactly this comment.
Exam tip Define your success so that p p p is the probability actually given. If a question states a 5% defect rate and asks about working items, it is usually cleaner to let "defective" be the success and answer through the complement.