Salick Academy

The Real Number System

No calculator

You have used these numbers for years. This topic asks a different question: which rules are we assuming, and what can be proved from them. That shift — from calculating to justifying — is what CAPE is testing.

Sets of numbers

Set Symbol Members
Natural numbers N\mathbb{N} 1,2,3,…1, 2, 3, \ldots
Whole numbers W\mathbb{W} 0,1,2,3,…0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots
Integers Z\mathbb{Z} …,−2,−1,0,1,2,…\ldots, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, \ldots
Rational numbers Q\mathbb{Q} anything expressible as pq\dfrac{p}{q} with p,q∈Zp, q \in \mathbb{Z}, q≠0q \ne 0
Real numbers R\mathbb{R} every point on the number line

Each set contains the one above it:

N⊂W⊂Z⊂Q⊂R\mathbb{N} \subset \mathbb{W} \subset \mathbb{Z} \subset \mathbb{Q} \subset \mathbb{R}

The irrational numbers are the reals that are not rational — 2\sqrt2, π\pi, ee. They fill in the gaps that Q\mathbb{Q} leaves.

The field axioms

For all a,b,c∈Ra, b, c \in \mathbb{R}:

Axiom Addition Multiplication
Closure a+b∈Ra + b \in \mathbb{R} ab∈Rab \in \mathbb{R}
Commutative a+b=b+aa + b = b + a ab=baab = ba
Associative (a+b)+c=a+(b+c)(a+b)+c = a+(b+c) (ab)c=a(bc)(ab)c = a(bc)
Identity a+0=aa + 0 = a a×1=aa \times 1 = a
Inverse a+(−a)=0a + (-a) = 0 a×1a=1a \times \dfrac1a = 1, for a≠0a \ne 0

and the one that links them, the distributive law:

a(b+c)=ab+aca(b+c) = ab + ac

Exam questions name the axiom being used. In 3(x+4)=3x+123(x + 4) = 3x + 12 the step is distributive; in 2+x=x+22 + x = x + 2 it is commutative; in x×1=xx \times 1 = x it is the multiplicative identity.

Closure

A set is closed under an operation if performing it on members of the set always lands you back inside the set.

Set ++ −- ×\times ÷\div
N\mathbb{N} yes no yes no
Z\mathbb{Z} yes yes yes no
Q\mathbb{Q} yes yes yes yes (excluding division by 0)
R\mathbb{R} yes yes yes yes (excluding division by 0)

N\mathbb{N} fails under subtraction because 3−5=−23 - 5 = -2, which is not a natural number. Z\mathbb{Z} fails under division because 3÷2=1.53 \div 2 = 1.5, which is not an integer.

The irrationals are not closed under any of the four operations:

2+(−2)=02×2=2\sqrt2 + (-\sqrt2) = 0 \qquad \sqrt2 \times \sqrt2 = 2

Both results are rational, from irrational inputs.

Rational and irrational numbers

A number is rational exactly when its decimal expansion terminates or recurs.

0.75=340.3˙=130.4˙=490.75 = \frac34 \qquad 0.\dot3 = \frac13 \qquad 0.\dot4 = \frac49

To convert a recurring decimal, let xx be the number, multiply by a power of 10 that shifts one full period, and subtract.

Express 0.1˙8˙0.\dot1\dot8 as a fraction.

x=0.181818…x = 0.181818\ldots 100x=18.181818…100x = 18.181818\ldots 99x=1899x = 18 x=1899=211x = \frac{18}{99} = \frac{2}{11}

An irrational number has a decimal expansion that never terminates and never settles into a repeating block.

Proving irrationality

The standard argument is by contradiction.

Prove that 2\sqrt2 is irrational.

Suppose, for contradiction, that 2\sqrt2 is rational. Then

2=pq\sqrt2 = \frac{p}{q}

for integers pp and qq with no common factor — the fraction is in lowest terms.

Squaring and rearranging:

2=p2q2⇒p2=2q22 = \frac{p^2}{q^2} \quad \Rightarrow \quad p^2 = 2q^2

So p2p^2 is even, and therefore pp is even (an odd number squared is odd). Write p=2mp = 2m:

(2m)2=2q2⇒4m2=2q2⇒q2=2m2(2m)^2 = 2q^2 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 4m^2 = 2q^2 \quad \Rightarrow \quad q^2 = 2m^2

So q2q^2 is even, and therefore qq is even.

But now pp and qq are both even, so they share the factor 2 — contradicting the assumption that the fraction was in lowest terms.

The assumption must be false, so 2\sqrt2 is irrational. ■\blacksquare

Working with the axioms

Two results worth knowing, both proved the same way.

The sum of a rational and an irrational is always irrational.

Suppose rr is rational and ii is irrational, and suppose for contradiction that r+i=sr + i = s is rational. Then

i=s−ri = s - r

But Q\mathbb{Q} is closed under subtraction, so s−rs - r is rational — making ii rational, which contradicts the assumption. Therefore r+ir + i is irrational. ■\blacksquare

The sum of two irrationals can be either.

2+3 is irrational2+(−2)=0 is rational\sqrt2 + \sqrt3 \text{ is irrational} \qquad \sqrt2 + (-\sqrt2) = 0 \text{ is rational}

So no general rule exists, and a question asking for one is asking you to notice that.