Salick Academy

The Real Number System

No calculator

You have used these numbers for years. This topic asks a different question: which rules are we assuming, and what can be proved from them. That shift — from calculating to justifying — is what CAPE is testing.

Sets of numbers

Set Symbol Members
Natural numbers N\mathbb{N} 1,2,3,1, 2, 3, \ldots
Whole numbers W\mathbb{W} 0,1,2,3,0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots
Integers Z\mathbb{Z} ,2,1,0,1,2,\ldots, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, \ldots
Rational numbers Q\mathbb{Q} anything expressible as pq\dfrac{p}{q} with p,qZp, q \in \mathbb{Z}, q0q \ne 0
Real numbers R\mathbb{R} every point on the number line

Each set contains the one above it:

NWZQR\mathbb{N} \subset \mathbb{W} \subset \mathbb{Z} \subset \mathbb{Q} \subset \mathbb{R}

The irrational numbers are the reals that are not rational — 2\sqrt2, π\pi, ee. They fill in the gaps that Q\mathbb{Q} leaves.

The field axioms

For all a,b,cRa, b, c \in \mathbb{R}:

Axiom Addition Multiplication
Closure a+bRa + b \in \mathbb{R} abRab \in \mathbb{R}
Commutative a+b=b+aa + b = b + a ab=baab = ba
Associative (a+b)+c=a+(b+c)(a+b)+c = a+(b+c) (ab)c=a(bc)(ab)c = a(bc)
Identity a+0=aa + 0 = a a×1=aa \times 1 = a
Inverse a+(a)=0a + (-a) = 0 a×1a=1a \times \dfrac1a = 1, for a0a \ne 0

and the one that links them, the distributive law:

a(b+c)=ab+aca(b+c) = ab + ac

Exam questions name the axiom being used. In 3(x+4)=3x+123(x + 4) = 3x + 12 the step is distributive; in 2+x=x+22 + x = x + 2 it is commutative; in x×1=xx \times 1 = x it is the multiplicative identity.

Closure

A set is closed under an operation if performing it on members of the set always lands you back inside the set.

Set ++ - ×\times ÷\div
N\mathbb{N} yes no yes no
Z\mathbb{Z} yes yes yes no
Q\mathbb{Q} yes yes yes yes (excluding division by 0)
R\mathbb{R} yes yes yes yes (excluding division by 0)

N\mathbb{N} fails under subtraction because 35=23 - 5 = -2, which is not a natural number. Z\mathbb{Z} fails under division because 3÷2=1.53 \div 2 = 1.5, which is not an integer.

The irrationals are not closed under any of the four operations:

2+(2)=02×2=2\sqrt2 + (-\sqrt2) = 0 \qquad \sqrt2 \times \sqrt2 = 2

Both results are rational, from irrational inputs.

Rational and irrational numbers

A number is rational exactly when its decimal expansion terminates or recurs.

0.75=340.3˙=130.4˙=490.75 = \frac34 \qquad 0.\dot3 = \frac13 \qquad 0.\dot4 = \frac49

To convert a recurring decimal, let xx be the number, multiply by a power of 10 that shifts one full period, and subtract.

Express 0.1˙8˙0.\dot1\dot8 as a fraction.

x=0.181818x = 0.181818\ldots 100x=18.181818100x = 18.181818\ldots 99x=1899x = 18 x=1899=211x = \frac{18}{99} = \frac{2}{11}

An irrational number has a decimal expansion that never terminates and never settles into a repeating block.

Proving irrationality

The standard argument is by contradiction.

Prove that 2\sqrt2 is irrational.

Suppose, for contradiction, that 2\sqrt2 is rational. Then

2=pq\sqrt2 = \frac{p}{q}

for integers pp and qq with no common factor — the fraction is in lowest terms.

Squaring and rearranging:

2=p2q2p2=2q22 = \frac{p^2}{q^2} \quad \Rightarrow \quad p^2 = 2q^2

So p2p^2 is even, and therefore pp is even (an odd number squared is odd). Write p=2mp = 2m:

(2m)2=2q24m2=2q2q2=2m2(2m)^2 = 2q^2 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 4m^2 = 2q^2 \quad \Rightarrow \quad q^2 = 2m^2

So q2q^2 is even, and therefore qq is even.

But now pp and qq are both even, so they share the factor 2 — contradicting the assumption that the fraction was in lowest terms.

The assumption must be false, so 2\sqrt2 is irrational. \blacksquare

Working with the axioms

Two results worth knowing, both proved the same way.

The sum of a rational and an irrational is always irrational.

Suppose rr is rational and ii is irrational, and suppose for contradiction that r+i=sr + i = s is rational. Then

i=sri = s - r

But Q\mathbb{Q} is closed under subtraction, so srs - r is rational — making ii rational, which contradicts the assumption. Therefore r+ir + i is irrational. \blacksquare

The sum of two irrationals can be either.

2+3 is irrational2+(2)=0 is rational\sqrt2 + \sqrt3 \text{ is irrational} \qquad \sqrt2 + (-\sqrt2) = 0 \text{ is rational}

So no general rule exists, and a question asking for one is asking you to notice that.